|
Home
About Orthodoxy
Our Parish
Calendar
Weekly Bulletin
The Epistle
Ministries
Events & News
GOLF
Greek Festival
Church Tour
Facility Rental
Links of
Interest
Contact
| |
ICONS
What
is an Icon?
Icons in the Church and Home
The Icon Controversy in the Early Church
What is an Icon
Icon
is a Greek word that means image. The word has come to
usually mean sacred image, though it really means much
more than that. For most of this document we will be talking about icons
as sacred images, but in order to fully understand what we mean, we'll
start with a much more specific and narrow definition. When God created
humans (see Gen. 1&2) he endowed our forbearers with His divine
image and likeness. (Gen. 1:26-27) In the discussion that follows, when
we talk about the Icon as an "artistic representation", we are
ultimately talking about the attempt to represent that "image of
God" in and through the person of the one portrayed. With that in
mind, let us consider the icon as an artistic and spiritual
representation of a sacred person or event.
Given that context, the
subject of an icon
is some person such as Christ, Mary the Theotokos (mother or bearer of
God), an Old or New Testament figure such as Abraham, the Prophet Elijah,
or an Apostle, etc., some hero of the Church, such as St. Nicholas or
St. Herman of Alaska, or some event from salvation history, such as the
the Nativity of Christ, the Resurrection, or an Ecumenical Council. And Iconography
is the spiritual art of expressing the spiritual reality
of these people and events using sacred symbolic forms and mystical
colors.
An icon, in fact, manifests our human participation in
the divine through its symbolic pictorial language. The Incarnation of
Christ (God made man, and thus visible) is the theological foundation
of the icon which seeks to reveal the divine through visible and
familiar content. In this sense, the icon has been called "a
meeting between heaven and earth".
The painting (more properly called
writing)
of icons is a special vocation. The iconographer is expected to fast,
pray, and live a holy life so as to be capable of expressing sacred and
divine mysteries. Thus the icon becomes, in a way, the fruit of the Holy
Spirit, containing spiritual power. Since the 9th Century, the Orthodox
Church has established a set of technical rules, or canons
for the artistic form of icons.
Icons have a very prominent and important place in the
worship and piety of the Orthodox Church. They are deeply rooted in the
gospel, and have been cherished and venerated by Christians from the
earliest times.
|
Icons in the Church and
Home
The tradition of placing icons in the church and home developed mainly
from the necessity in the early second century to counteract the false
Gnostic teaching that Christ was only a shadow and not
really and fully human. The Christians countered this
incorrect teaching by emphasizing the reality of Christ as the God-Man,
for: "...the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, full of grace
and truth." (John 1:14) The Christians emphasized the human nature
of Christ in pictures, writings, hymns, and prayers, and thus the
portrayal of Christ developed in the course of time into the icon. The
Christians began to place the icon of Christ in the church, where it was
later joined by icons of the Theotokos and all the saints. The tendency
of people to honor their beloved ones in pictures was reflected in their
desire to have the pictures of Christ and the Saints out of respect and
honor, for "the honor which is given to the icon passes over to the
prototype", the person himself.
The lighting of a candle, the making of the sign of the
Cross, and the kissing of an icon should not be misinterpreted as being
made to the physical picture itself. These gestures pass over
from the icon to the person depicted. Among other things, the icon
should remind us of the person depicted, that, since death does not end
life, the person depicted is "alive in Christ", and should
help us to "imitate their virtues and to glorify God."
The practice of keeping the Holy Icons eventually lead
to great controversy in the Church. In the Eighth Century a group called
the Iconoclasts, under pressure from the encroaching Turks made a move
to have the Holy Icons banned and destroyed, causing a great division
amongst the Christian Church. This controversy led to the convening of
the 7th Ecumenical Council in 787. That Synod decreed that the Holy
Icons are to be used to render honor (veneration) to the person honored,
but not worship, since worship is due God alone. This Ecumenical
decision is the source of the annual celebration of the Triumph of
Orthodoxy on the First Sunday of Great Lent. At the same synod,
the use of statues, the use of which had become perverted over time, was
banned.
Kissing the icon, bowing towards it, making the sign of the cross, while
they all seem foreign to the western mind are all simple means of
showing love, honor, and respect to the one portrayed. These customs all
represent proper forms of greeting one's superiors in the cultures that
are the home of Orthodox Christianity. In doing these
things, we are reminded of the high spiritual values and virtues of the
holy ones depicted, and encouraged to pursue those same values and
virtues ourselves.
In Orthodox tradition, icons are not intended to be
realistic paintings of people and events (though they cannot do violence
to the physical reality), but rather are symbolic interpretations of the
great spiritual qualities of the saints... such as sacrifice, humility,
devotion, faith and love. In all cases, the Icon will tell the rank and
something of the deeds of the person depicted in the icon.
|
The
Icon Controversy in the Early Church
As early as the seventh century,
there existed a serious controversy concerning the matter of Icons.
This controversy created a challenging problem for the Church, for
within the Church, there were two different groups with two different
attitudes towards Icons.
The Iconoclasts
The first group of Christians felt that it was improper to use Icons
in the Church. They reasoned that since Jesus Christ was Divine, He
could not and should not be portrayed by an earthly image. They also
were convinced that the depiction and veneration of an Image of Christ
amounted to nothing more than idolatry and superstition.
They argued that the faithful
would look to the Icon as an idol, and worship it rather than God
Himself. They were sure that Icons would lead people into pagan
practices and away from communion with Christ Himself. These people
were known as Iconoclasts, which means 'Icon-breakers,' and with fiery
zeal, they proceeded to fight against the presence of Icons in the
Church and to rid the Church of all Images.
The Iconodules
The second group of Christians took the opposite view, they believed
that the depiction and veneration of Icons had a significant place in
the religious life of the Christian community. They believed that
Jesus Christ could be and should be depicted in the form of material
Images.
This group reasoned that even
though Jesus Christ was Divine, that He had become a real man and had
truly assumed human nature. Therefore, He could be and should be
portrayed or depicted in a human form. They also maintained that it
was equally proper and right to love and venerate the Image of Christ.
For in doing so, they were offering an expression of worship and
devotion to the Person represented by the material Image.
Since they loved and reverenced
Christ Himself, they saw nothing wrong with looking upon His Icon as
an endearing and holy object. In fact, they felt compelled to worship
Jesus Christ through the form of Icon-veneration.
These people were called
Iconodules, which means 'Icon-venerators,' and with the deepest
devotion, they were determined to preserve the presence of Icons
within the Church and to promote the use of such Images within the
Christian community.
The Conflict
Out of these two different and opposing positions, a passionate
struggle developed. The quarrel rose to violent heights in the eighth
century, when the Emperor, Leo III, aided the Iconoclasts in the
destruction of Icons. Throughout this whole conflict the Church was
strongly opposed to the attitude of the Iconoclasts and tried with all
its might to uphold the position of the Iconodules.
Saint
John of Damascus and other notable Church Fathers wrote and preached
extensively in the defense of Icons, yet in spite of the Church's
efforts, the terrifying conflict continued and resulted in sacrilege
and desecration. Many icons were destroyed by fire and by other means.
The faithful endured much ridicule and suffering and many even lost
their lives in defense of Iconography.
A Struggle for Truth
Some might feel that it was rather silly to fight over the right to
paint and honor a picture of Jesus Christ, but the conflict went very
deep, and there was much at stake. At the bare roots of the whole
battle was the struggle for truth.
An
Icon is more than a mere picture. An Icon is a form of painting that
bears witness to divine and religious truth. An Icon is a means of
knowledge and teaching. This truth may be depicted in the form of a
person or persons, or an event. Sometimes all elements are combined,
never-the-less, there is always some message of revelation.
For example, an Icon of Christ
and the Theotokos is a manifestation of the truth of the Incarnation
(that is, the truth that God became man). Our veneration of such an
Image is an act of allegiance to the Truth Himself; it is an
expression of commitment to Jesus Christ and His mission.
The
Icon of Pentecost, with the Holy Spirit descending on the Holy
Apostles and disciples, is a depicted event that reveals another
important truth in our Christian life and tradition. This truth is the
fulfillment of Christ's promise to send the Spirit of Truth, and the
reality of the Holy Spirit's presence in the church and in our
personal life.
A Point of Spiritual Contact
An Icon also acts as a 'point of spiritual contact' between the human
and divine and should be understood as something sacramental. An Icon
of Christ is a material object that is consecrated by the Church to be
a medium of Divine Grace, whereby we can enter into communion with our
Lord and Savior. An Icon of Christ is an instrument of His personal
presence.
When we pray before His Image,
we stand face to face before Christ and enter into a personal
relationship with Him. When we kiss His Icon, we not only show our
love and respect for Him, we actually kiss Christ Himself, and thereby
bestow our affection. When we light a candle before His Image, we
honor Him and make an act of faith in His presence. When we kneel
before His Icon, we are bowing down before Christ and worshipping Him.
An Aid to Devotion
It is true that we can experience communion with Christ without Icons.
Yet Icons can deepen this experience. They can create within us a
sharper awareness of the 'divine presence.' They awaken a more
favorable disposition for prayer. They can evoke meditation and a
deeper appreciation of God's gracious acts for our salvation. They can
imprint upon our minds a more vivid image of the idea of things which
are necessary for our spiritual growth.
For the Orthodox Church, the
Icon has always been regarded as a valuable aid to devotion and
spirituality. It has aroused love for God; it has deepened faith; it
has nurtured piety; it has inspired dedication. Therefore, it has
always held an endearing and significant place in the spiritual and
devotional life of the Church.
Final Victory
Final victory in the Iconoclastic struggle was not achieved until the
year 843. Nevertheless, the Fathers of the Seventh Ecumenical Council,
held in Nicea in 787, defined the true Christian attitude toward Icons
and succeeded in restoring them to their proper place in Christian
worship. This definition is still regarded by the Orthodox Church as
the correct and official pronouncement on the subject of Icons and on
the true Christian attitude toward them:
"To
make our confession short, we keep unchanged all the ecclesiastical
traditions handed down to us, whether written or unwritten. One of
these is the portrayal of painted representations, which by the way is
a tradition in agreement with the message of the Gospel. For since
both the painted representations and the message of the Gospel
proclaim the incarnation of God the Word as being real and not as
being a mere apparition, and since both benefit us in many other ways,
it is then clear that they support each other and testify to each
other."
"Therefore, adhering to the
divinely inspired authority of our Holy Fathers and the tradition of
the Catholic Church (for, as we know, this tradition is of the Holy
Spirit who dwells in the Church) and following the royal procedure, we
define with accuracy and certainty that the holy and venerable Icons
are to be set up in the same way as the figure of the precious and
life-giving Cross."
"We declare that painted
Images and those in mosaic and other suitable material of our Lord and
Savior Jesus Christ, of our undefiled Lady the Theotokos, of the
honorable Angels, and of all the Saints and Holy People are to be
placed in the holy Churches of God, on sacred vessels and vestments,
on walls and panels, in houses and by the roadsides. For the more
continually these persons are observed through such painted
representations, so much the more will the observers be aroused to
recollect or remember the depicted persons and to aspire after
them."
"They will also be aroused,
as is duly proper, to honor, reverence and salute such Images. Indeed,
we do not say that people are to pay such Images the actual worship of
faith which is properly due only to the Divine nature. But just as we
do to the figure of the venerable and life-giving Cross, and to the
Holy Book of Gospels and other sacred objects, so we must also honor
Icons with the offerings of incense and candles; for such has been the
pious custom of antiquity. For the honor paid to the Icon passes to
its prototype, and he who venerates an Icon venerates through it the
person that is depicted...."
|